Value of Dermoscopy in a Population-Based Screening Sample by Dermatologists

Isabelle Hoorens; Katrien Vossaert; Sven Lanssens; Laurence Dierckxsens; Giuseppe Argenziano; Lieve Brochez

doi:10.5826/dpc.0903a05

Value of Dermoscopy in a Population-Based Screening Sample by Dermatologists

Authors

Isabelle Hoorens Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
Katrien Vossaert Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent & Private Practice, Maldegem, Belgium
Sven Lanssens Private Practice, Maldegem, Belgium
Laurence Dierckxsens Department of Dermatology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
Giuseppe Argenziano Department of Dermatology, Second University of Naples, Italy
Lieve Brochez Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium

Keywords:

dermoscopy, screening, melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

Background: The use of dermoscopy improves the diagnosis of skin cancer significantly in trained dermatologists. However, to evaluate its cost-effectiveness in daily practice, not only sensitivity but also the excision rate is important.

Objective: We examined the diagnostic accuracy of cases from a true population-based sample scored by general dermatologists.

Methods: One hundred twenty-six dermatologists were randomly assigned to 145 digital cases of lesions detected at a skin cancer screening. This resulted in 4,655 case evaluations using a web application. Accuracy of diagnosis and treatment was correlated with the histological diagnosis or expert opinion.

Results: The larger portion (89.7%) of the participating dermatologists reported using their dermatoscope daily. The odds of making a correct diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy was 5.38 compared with naked-eye examination (NEE). Dermoscopy increased sensitivity for skin cancer diagnosis from 70.6% to 84.6%, but this was associated with a small but significant decrease in specificity of 3.5%. To detect 1 skin cancer, 5.23 lesions had to be biopsied/excised in this sample and this was not significantly improved by dermoscopic evaluation. Dermoscopy significantly increased the confidence about making a correct diagnosis, especially in seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma.

Conclusions: Dermoscopy significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, the sensitivity of skin cancer detection, and the confidence in diagnosis especially for seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma. However, this finding was not reflected in a significant reduction in the number needed to excise in this sample.

References

Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3(3):159-165.

Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, et al. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(10):1343-1350.

Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(3):669-676.

Pehamberger H, Binder M, Steiner A, et al. In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100(3):356S-362S.

Altamura D, Menzies SW, Argenziano G, et al. Dermatoscopy of basal cell carcinoma: morphologic variability of global and local features and accuracy of diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(1):67-75.

Menzies SW, Westerhoff K, Rabinovitz H, et al. Surface microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(8):1012-1016.

Pan Y, Chamberlain AJ, Bailey M, et al. Dermatoscopy aids in the diagnosis of the solitary red scaly patch or plaque-features distinguishing superficial basal cell carcinoma, intraepidermal carcinoma, and psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(2):268-274.

Chevolet I, Hoorens I, Janssens A, et al. A short dermoscopy training increases diagnostic performance in both inexperienced and experienced dermatologists. Australas J Dermatol. 2015;56(1):52-55.

Hoorens I, Vossaert K, Pil L, et al. Total-body examination vs lesion-directed skin cancer screening. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(1):27-34.

Killip S, Mahfoud Z, Pearce K. What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(3):204-208.

Breton AL, Amini-Adle M, Duru G, Poulalhon N, Dalle S, Thomas L. Overview of the use of dermoscopy in academic and non-academic hospital centres in France: a nationwide survey. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(9):1207-1213.

Venugopal SS, Soyer HP, Menzies SW. Results of a nationwide dermoscopy survey investigating the prevalence, advantages and disadvantages of dermoscopy use among Australian dermatologists. Australas J Dermatol. 2011;52(1):14-18.

Waldmann A, Nolte S, Geller AC, et al. Frequency of excisions and yields of malignant skin tumors in a population-based screening intervention of 360,288 whole-body examinations. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(8):903-910.

Argenziano G, Cerroni L, Zalaudek I, et al. Accuracy in melanoma detection: a 10-year multicenter survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(1):54-59.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Melanoma—assessment and management of melanoma. (NG14) 2015. Availible at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng14. Accessed March 15, 2019.