Dermoscopy Differentiates Guttate Psoriasis From a Mimicker—Pityriasis Rosea

Dermoscopy Differentiates Guttate Psoriasis From a Mimicker—Pityriasis Rosea

Authors

  • Meena Makhecha Department of Dermatology, HBT Medical College & Dr. R.N. Cooper Hospital, Mumbai, India
  • Tishya Singh Department of Dermatology, HBT Medical College & Dr. R.N. Cooper Hospital, Mumbai, India
  • Yasmeen Khatib Department of Dermatology, HBT Medical College & Dr. R.N. Cooper Hospital, Mumbai, India

Keywords:

guttate psoriasis, pityriasis rosea, dermoscopy, mimicker

Abstract

Background: Guttate psoriasis (GP) and pityriasis rosea (PR) are a part of papulosquamous disorders that have very similar clinical features and often require histopathology to confirm the diagnosis. Dermoscopy has emerged as a noninvasive, cost-effective technique that can aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases like GP and PR.

Objective: To study and compare the dermoscopic features of GP and PR.

Methods: Twenty consecutive patients each with GP or PR were enrolled in the study. The diagnoses of GP and PR were made clinically and on histopathology. Dermoscopic images were taken of the representative lesions from each patient using a manual dermoscope attached to a digital camera after applying ultrasound gel. Vascular morphology, vascular arrangement, background color, along with color and distribution of scales were noted in each case. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square test to determine the significance of findings in both groups.

Results: The combination of a bright red background with dotted vessels in uniform diffuse distribution with diffuse white scales was highly specific for the diagnosis of GP. Lesions of PR showed a red background with dotted blood vessels in nonspecific distribution. Scales were either white in color or brown pigmented with patchy distribution. Brown pigmentation and brown dots were additional findings in cases of PR.

Conclusion: Combinations of dermoscopic patterns can aid in the diagnosis of GP and PR in the majority of the cases.

References

Parsons JM. Pityriasis rosea update: 1986. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;15(2):159-167. DOI: 10.1016/S0190-9622(86)70151-5.

Nischal KC, Khopkar U. Dermoscope. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2005;71(4):300-303. DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.16633. PMID:16394450.

Conforti C, Giuffrida R, Vezzoni R, Resende FS, di Meo N, Zalaudek I. Dermoscopy and the experienced clinicians. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59(1):16-22. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14512. PMID: 31222814.

Errichetti E, Zalaudek I, Kittler H, et al. Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non‐neoplastic dermatoses): an expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(2):454-467. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18125. PMID: 31077336.

Errichetti E, Lacarrubba F, Micali G, Piccirillo A, Stinco G. Differentiation of pityriasis lichenoides chronica from guttate psoriasis by dermoscopy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015;40(7):804-806. DOI: 10.1111/ced.12580. PMID: 25682853.

Bunch LW, Tilley JC. Pityriasis rosea. Arch Dermatol. 1961;84:79-86. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1961.01580130085012. PMID: 13688837.

Aiba S, Tagami H. Immunohistologic studies in pityriasis rosea. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121(6):761-765. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1985.01660060075025. PMID: 3890762.

Panizzon R, Bloch PH. Histopathology of pityriasis rosea Gibert: qualitative and quantitative light- microscopic study of 62 biopsies of 40 patients. Dermatologica. 1982;165(6):551-558. DOI: 10.1159/000250021. PMID: 7169130.

Okamoto H, Imamura S, Aoshima T, Komura J, Ofuji S. Dyskeratotic degeneration of epidermal cells in pityriasis rosea: Light and electron microscopic studies. Br J Dermatol. 1982;107(2):189-194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1982.tb00337.x. PMID: 6179530.

Lallas A, Kyrgidis A, Tzellos TG, et al. Accuracy of dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of psoriasis, dermatitis, lichen planus and pityriasis rosea. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(6):1198-1205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10868.x. PMID: 22296226.

Chuh AA. Collarette scaling in pityriasis rosea demonstrated by digital epiluminescence dermatoscopy. Australas J Dermatol. 2001;42(4):288-290. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0960.2001.00538.x. PMID: 11903165.

Ankad BS, Beergouder SL. Dermoscopy of inflammatory conditions: the journey so far. EMJ Dermatol. 2017;5(1):98-105.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-29

Issue

Section

Research

How to Cite

1.
Makhecha M, Singh T, Khatib Y. Dermoscopy Differentiates Guttate Psoriasis From a Mimicker—Pityriasis Rosea. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(1):e2021138. doi:10.5826/dpc.1101a138

Share